If you have been freelancing for more than about five minutes, you have probably encountered this problem. You send the client your beautifully clear KoffeeKlatch terms, they sign them and, just as you are about to get on with the work, somebody emails you another document and asks you to sign that too.
Signing two contracts for the same work does not give both parties twice the protection. It can leave you with two sets of payment terms, two descriptions of the services and two completely different versions of who is responsible when something goes wrong. It is less like wearing a belt and braces and more like wearing two seatbelts attached to two different cars.
Why signing two contracts for the same work causes problems
A contract is not a statement of general good intentions. It sets out the obligations each party has agreed to undertake. If two contracts cover the same services and say different things, you may not know which obligations apply until there is a dispute—and that is precisely when you need certainty.
Conflicting clauses collide
Your contract may require payment within 14 days while the client’s says 60. Yours may limit your liability to a particular amount while theirs contains no effective limit at all. The two documents may also contain different provisions about cancellation, intellectual property, confidentiality, data protection and the courts that will deal with a dispute.
Those terms cannot all operate neatly together merely because both documents have been signed.
Your protections may be undermined
People sometimes assume that the contract signed most recently will automatically replace the first one. It is rarely that simple. The outcome can depend on what the documents say, how and when each was presented, whether one incorporates or excludes other terms and what the parties said and did.
If the position has to be unravelled after something has gone wrong, you have already lost the clarity that a properly organised contract should have given you.
A dispute becomes harder and more expensive
If both parties point to a different agreement, time and money may be spent arguing about which terms formed the contract before anyone even reaches the original problem. Your carefully drafted protections may not have disappeared, but you cannot safely assume they will prevail either.
Why clients send their own contracts
A client asking you to sign another document is not necessarily trying to take advantage of you. They may not have read the terms they have already signed, or someone in procurement, finance or HR may routinely issue the organisation’s standard contract.
Sometimes the client thinks that more documents must mean more protection. Occasionally, what they actually need is not another contract for the services at all, but a confidentiality agreement or a data processing agreement.
The important thing is to identify what the new document is intended to achieve before you sign it.
What to do when a client sends their contract after signing yours
There is no need to panic-sign it, reject it indignantly or turn the situation into a confrontation. Start by acknowledging it and giving yourself time to read it:
Thanks—I’ll take a look and check how this fits with the terms we have already agreed.
You can then explain the practical problem:
As we already have an agreement covering these services, signing a second contract could create conflicting obligations. It would be clearer for both of us to identify anything you need to add or change and agree how that should be incorporated into one set of terms.
Ask what their contract covers that yours does not, and why they need you to sign theirs. You may discover that the point they are concerned about is already covered by your contract. If something genuinely needs to change, you can both agree the change and get one contract that says that for both of you to sign.
One service, one working relationship and one clearly identifiable main contract is a much safer starting point.
What if they call it an NDA?
“NDA” is often used as a catch-all label for several different things. The client may want to protect information shared before you agree to work together, impose confidentiality obligations during the project or deal with your handling of personal data. Those are not necessarily the same job and they do not all require the same document.
Before signing, establish what the client is actually trying to protect. Our guide to non-disclosure agreements, confidentiality and data processing agreements explains the differences and the questions to ask.
What if they need a data processing agreement?
If you process personal data on the client’s behalf, the UK GDPR may require controller–processor terms. That does not mean that the client needs to issue an entirely new contract covering every aspect of the services.
KoffeeKlatch service agreements include the relevant data-processing framework and documents for the parties to complete. You can use those or consider the client’s DPA, but you still need to read the client’s version carefully. Its liability, security, audit or indemnity provisions may contradict the commercial terms in your main agreement.
A DPA can sit alongside the main contract because it performs a distinct function. It should not quietly rewrite the rest of your relationship.
Clauses that need particular care
Do not “sign and crack on” without checking provisions dealing with:
-
unlimited or disproportionate liability;
-
indemnities that place all the risk on you;
-
ownership of intellectual property;
-
payment periods that do not work for your business;
-
cancellation rights that allow the client to terminate immediately while binding you for much longer;
-
confidentiality obligations you cannot realistically meet;
-
data-handling duties that conflict with the UK GDPR or with how the work will actually be delivered; and
-
restrictions on working with other clients.
These are not harmless. They can change the price, risk and even the practicality of providing the service.
Our top tips on understanding the contracts your client wants you to sign will help you work through the terminology and spot the areas that need discussion.
When you need the two contracts compared
Sometimes you can identify the client’s concern and resolve it with a straightforward conversation. At other times, their contract is long, the differences are difficult to trace or you cannot tell which of your existing protections would be affected.
Our Client Contract Comparison compares the client’s proposed terms with your KoffeeKlatch terms. You receive a traffic-light summary of the important differences and the points that may need to be clarified or negotiated before you agree.
Think of it this way
Your contract is your seatbelt. Strapping a second contract over the top does not make you twice as safe; it may simply tangle you up.
The aim is not to refuse every document a client sends you. It is to understand what they need, identify any genuine changes and record the final agreement clearly.
One service, one relationship, one main contract. That is how you protect your boundaries, your income and your time—and keep your ducks lined in a row.
